Disguised speculation

From Hedge.lu
Revision as of 17:42, 24 June 2017 by Hector (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Firms Involved

  • American Barrick

Year of the event


Description of the case

Barrick American (today Barrick Gold) is a North American mining company. It became famous for its hedging program set up in the 90s, which heavily used Spot deferred contracts (SDCs). SDCs are similar to forward in the way that they define a delivery quantity, date and price at time t=0. At maturity T, the supplier has the option to roll-forward the contract at a premium or proceed to the delivery. In effect, this contract permits the firm to roll-forward losses while realizing gains immediately, increasing progressively the liabilities of the firm when the gold price is going up. American Barrick ended up winding down its positions in 2009, posting a $5.4 billion loss[1][2].


  • One should only hedge if there are spill-over effects and externalities affecting positively the projects or assets of the company. Allowing hedging otherwise results in a perverse incentive for the firm and in an inappropriate allocation of capital.
  • Unrealized losses cannot be postponed forever, and will one day be realized.


  1. Metro, Barrick Gold posts US$5.4 billion net loss on windup of gold hedging program
  2. Barrick Gold, Barrick Reports Q3 Results