Difference between revisions of "HFT Thrive off complexity"
From Hedge.lu
(Created page with "== Firm Involved == * IEX == Year of the event == 2016 == Description of the case == IEX became an approved stock exchange in 2015. Two particularities are noteworthy regard...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 01:41, 22 June 2017
Firm Involved
- IEX
Year of the event
2016
Description of the case
IEX became an approved stock exchange in 2015. Two particularities are noteworthy regarding this stock exchange: it introduced a speed bump designed to prevent so-called “front-running” by HFT. It also introduced a complex order type called D-PEG. All this complexity leaves IEX as a marginal actor of the sector, with the most volume being dark-traded (20% lit volume), and with HFT such as Citadel regularly top trader. In addition, other stock exchanges also started their own DPEG/Speed bump, with less “pure” goals than IEX.
Take-aways
- Introducing complexity creates even more unfair treatments.
- HFT always end up winning from added complexity.
- Good intentions sometimes end up harming the market.
